Academic freedom is the freedom to pursue fruitful avenues of inquiry, to teach and learn unhindered.
UBC’s Academic Calendar contains the current Senate-approved (1976) statement on academic freedom, outlining the positive obligations on the university, and all its members, to promote and protect this central freedom of the academy.
In July 2016, the Office of the Provost appointed Dr. Neil Guppy as Senior Advisor on Academic Freedom. Dr. Guppy works to advance the centrality of academic freedom to our various missions, and develops educational materials for the university community in the support and protection of academic freedom. He reports to the Provosts on both the Vancouver and Okanagan campuses.
One of Dr. Guppy's first tasks was to draft a brief history of academic freedom at UBC, which can be found here.
The Honourable Lynn Smith, QC authored the most recent report on academic freedom written for the university. It can be found here.
Frequently asked questions about academic freedom
Please find below answers to a few frequently asked questions about academic freedom.
Academic freedom consists of “the freedom, within the law, to pursue what seems to [members of the University] as fruitful avenues of inquiry, to teach and to learn unhindered by external or non-academic constraints, [and] to engage in full and unrestricted consideration of any opinion” (UBC Senate Statement, 1976).
Academic freedom applies to “the regular members of the University” as well as “to all who are invited to participate in its forum” (UBC Senate Statement, 1976).
Major justifications for academic freedom come in two forms. First, the pursuit of truth is understood to be a self-evident value of the highest order since its discovery illuminates what has previously been mysterious or unknown. Second, the pure and unfettered pursuit of ideas has led to greater and greater enhancements in human wellbeing (e.g., life expectancy).
Many experts on academic freedom feel it applies both to individuals at the university and to the university itself. As an institution, academic freedom implies that the decisions about who to hire, what to teach, what research infrastructure to create, and so forth are best made by academics shielded from external forces, be they commercial, cultural, political, or religious.
Yes, speech and actions must be lawful. Also, the word academic modifies freedom in such a way that the freedom should be understood as being subject to the broad dictates of disciplinary colleagues. Professional standards of a profession or discipline apply. Finally, depending upon one's level of responsibility in the organization, academic freedom may be more limited. Senior administrators are held to a different standard than are junior faculty or students, especially when it comes to criticism of the university.
Faculty occupying administrative roles are expected to be more judicious in criticizing university policies and practices – time and place are important. Likewise Heads of Units are expected to uphold policy and practice, although like other senior administrators they are encouraged to participate fully and actively in the design of policy and procedures.
UBC, and all of its members, must “support, safeguard and preserve” academic freedom. This means, from an institutional perspective, that UBC as an organization has a “positive obligation” to provide the working conditions for all of its members to pursue effectively learning, research, service, and teaching. Universities are charter institutions with a distinctive mandate, a mandate unlike any other organization. That mandate principally involves the methodical discovery and dissemination of truth and understanding about matters that are serious and important. Given this mandate, the university is expected to put in place structures, procedures, and practices that promote independent thinking and that safeguard the institution and its members from external political, religious, or commercial interference.
Academic freedom implies academic responsibility. With the freedom to pursue any and all ideas comes the responsibility to do so honestly, accountably, openly, and fairly. UBC policies on Scholarly Integrity, Harassment and Discrimination, Fundraising and Acceptance of Donations, and Conflict of Interest and Commitment, and others, including the UBC statement on Respectful Environment, can condition academic freedom. Scholars are expected, for example, to know and follow the prevailing scholarly practices within their field of specialization (Policy 85). Likewise they are expected to act in ways that do not “undermine public confidence and trust” in the university (Policy 97).
Some experts argue that academic speech is subject to quality control in that it must be responsible, scholarly speech that meets obligations of rigour and peer review. Also academic activity extends well beyond expression, to include activities like selecting research topics, assembling research teams, and hiring / promotion processes. Furthermore, if academic freedom has an institutional component, then this too clearly distinguishes academic freedom from freedom of expression.
The UBC Senate approved a statement on academic freedom in 1976 (see Senate Minutes, December, 1976). This statement was subsequently incorporated into the UBC Collective Agreement between the University and the Faculty Association (2004). In the Collective Agreement, a short preamble was also added.
Policy 85 (Scholarly Integrity); from that policy
2. Responsibilities 2.1. UBC Persons are responsible for familiarizing themselves with the scholarly standards and practices that are generally accepted within the relevant scholarly field and following them honestly, accountably, openly and fairly.
Policy 97 (Conflict of Interest and Conflict of Commitment); from that policy
[acting] in support of the University’s integrity and fundamental mission and avoiding circumstances that may undermine public confidence and trust
Policy 114 (Fundraising and Acceptance of Donations); from that policy
2.2 UBC values and will protect its integrity, autonomy and academic freedom, and will not accept donations when a condition of such acceptance would compromise these fundamental principles.